The gemara says that the מזבח הזהב, the golden altar, was positioned in the heichal between the menorah and the shulkhan. Only, it was "moved a little to the east" (Rashi: משוך כלפי מזרח קימעא) so that the two of them could see one another (בעינן דחזו להדייהו); the verse says "המנורה נוכח השלחן".
So I wasn't clear how far the golden altar had to be moved. Rashi says קמעא, a little, so it sounds as though seeing one another a little would be enough. However, even without moving they see one another a little. The golden altar is one amah by one amah, the table is much bigger and so is the menorah. From the description of Rashi Shmos 25(35), it sounds as if the side branches go up 10 tefachim at an angle, which I guess might make it 10 tefachim to each side as well, more than three amos wide. It would be especially true according to the opinion that the menorah faced east-west.
But see Rashi Shmos 26(35):
.המזבח והשלחן והמנורה משוכים מן הפתח לצד מערב עשר אמות
Sure sounds like it was shifted only a little.
So I wasn't clear how far the golden altar had to be moved. Rashi says קמעא, a little, so it sounds as though seeing one another a little would be enough. However, even without moving they see one another a little. The golden altar is one amah by one amah, the table is much bigger and so is the menorah. From the description of Rashi Shmos 25(35), it sounds as if the side branches go up 10 tefachim at an angle, which I guess might make it 10 tefachim to each side as well, more than three amos wide. It would be especially true according to the opinion that the menorah faced east-west.
But see Rashi Shmos 26(35):
.המזבח והשלחן והמנורה משוכים מן הפתח לצד מערב עשר אמות
Sure sounds like it was shifted only a little.